« The Township Mindset | Main | Green Homes? »

Cluster Development

December 08, 2004

Yes Rob, I like the idea of cluster development - to a point

First of all, for the sake of all my readers, this is my definition of cluster development:

Cluster development requires that new development be built as close together as possible in order to preserve open space in the new development.

An example: A new development proposes 40 homes on 40 acres. Normal development regulations may require 1 acre per home. Cluster development, however, can require that the 40 homes be built on 20 acres, and the other 20 acres be set aside as protected open space.

The preservation of that open space is the most important part of cluster development. Open space serves multiple purposes in new development:

Often, cluster development is zoned into the PUD format. PUDs (Planned Unit Developments) encompass many zoning rules into one format. A PUD zone usually sits on top of multiple parcels to allow a landowner to develop all of his separate parcels into one, well-planned development.

The Holland area, especially the City of Holland, has taken a liking to the PUD, and cluster development, format, and particularly the traditional neighborhood design. The largest PUD in Holland is being built just west of M-40 and south of I-196. Another recent PUD/Cluster development that is near completion is Cobblestone. Finally, another development just starting at 104th and Ottagan, Knollwood, is taking this concept to Holland Charter Township.

While these traditional-looking neighborhoods use the PUD and cluster development structure, I still have concerns with their misunderstood use. The close neighborhood format is promoted as a walkable community, because the homes are closer together and sidewalks line the streets. However, the residents can really only walk between homes, because these developments are in the middle of (relatively) nowhere. What’s the point of being able to walk if you can’t walk to the corner store, church or the bus stop?

That said, I really don’t have much bad to say about the concept of cluster development. I’m all for development options that preserve open space and reduce the amount of stormwater runoff.

For another explanation of cluster development, including some graphics, check out this Rural Cluster Development website.

Posted by paul at December 8, 2004 09:02 AM

Comments

Brandon said on December 9, 2004 10:48 PM

I guess my main problem with cluster development is that, while it uses land better than a conventional development, it is still largely rural, single-use, auto-based development miles from the city. An ideal world would have the "clustering" of development at the regional level... clustered around urban cores rather than on one corner of a parcel, and of course with the requisite transit & commercial facilities. But again, that's the ideal. In reality, it's a great improvement from the usual status quo of homes evenly distributed on 1-acre lawns.

Ben said on December 10, 2004 09:20 AM

The real issue is do you want to build these absurdly wasteful and generally stupid houses five steps apart or 15 steps apart. Either way you cut it the houses are still stupid. I love that developers who build insanly ineffecient houses close together are now being seen as "green developments." It is a crazy world. We are way off our rocker.

Paul said on December 10, 2004 09:34 AM

But Ben, how are these insanely inefficient? What kind of homes would you have people live in? Apartments, townhomes, row houses?

Ben said on December 10, 2004 03:01 PM

I'm talking about the size, materials, insulation, and general design. Totally disconnected.
We need actual "green developments" where houses produce their own energy and recycle their waste.
WASTE=FOOD.

Post a comment




Remember Me?


Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.meermacatawa.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/38